Use of high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening data in cancer hazard evaluations by IARC Monograph Working Groups.

نویسندگان

  • Weihsueh A Chiu
  • Kathryn Z Guyton
  • Matthew T Martin
  • David M Reif
  • Ivan Rusyn
چکیده

Evidence regarding carcinogenic mechanisms serves a critical role in International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monograph evaluations. Three recent IARC Working Groups pioneered inclusion of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ToxCast program high-throughput screening (HTS) data to supplement other mechanistic evidence. In Monograph V110, HTS profiles were compared between perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and prototypical activators across multiple nuclear receptors. For Monograph V112-113, HTS assays were mapped to 10 key characteristics of carcinogens identified by an IARC expert group, and systematically considered as an additional mechanistic data stream. Both individual assay results and ToxPi-based rankings informed mechanistic evaluations. Activation of multiple nuclear receptors in HTS assays showed that PFOA targets not only peroxisome proliferator activated receptors, but also other receptors. ToxCast assays substantially covered 5 of 10 key characteristics, corroborating literature evidence of "induces oxidative stress" and "alters cell proliferation, cell death or nutrient supply" and filling gaps for "modulates receptor-mediated effects." Thus, ToxCast HTS data were useful both in evaluating specific mechanistic hypotheses and in contributing to the overall evaluation of mechanistic evidence. However, additional HTS assays are needed to provide more comprehensive coverage of the 10 key characteristics of carcinogens that form the basis of current IARC mechanistic evaluations.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Some N- and S-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Benz[a]acridine was considered by previous IARC Working Groups in 1983 and 1987 (IARC, 1983, 1987). Since that time, new data have become available; these have been incorporated into the Monograph, and taken into consideration in the present evaluation. Benz[c]acridine was considered by previous Working Groups in 1972, 1983, and 1987 (IARC, 1973a, 1983, 1987). Since that time, new data have bec...

متن کامل

Some N- and S-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Benz[a]acridine was considered by previous IARC Working Groups in 1983 and 1987 (IARC, 1983, 1987). Since that time, new data have become available; these have been incorporated into the Monograph, and taken into consideration in the present evaluation. Benz[c]acridine was considered by previous Working Groups in 1972, 1983, and 1987 (IARC, 1973a, 1983, 1987). Since that time, new data have bec...

متن کامل

IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention, Volume 7: Breast Cancer Screening

The latest publication in the International Agency for Research on Cancer’s (IARC) series of Handbooks of Cancer Prevention is focused on breast cancer screening. The monograph is the outcome of a weeklong meeting of the Working Group on the Evaluation of Cancer-Preventive Strategies that took place in Lyon, France, March 5–12, 2002. The decision to produce a handbook on breast cancer screening...

متن کامل

Meeting Report: Summary of IARC Monographs on Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol, and 1-tert-Butoxy-2-Propanol

An international, interdisciplinary working group of expert scientists met in June 2004 to develop IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans (IARC Monographs) on formaldehyde, 2-butoxyethanol, and 1-tert-butoxy-2-propanol. Each IARC Monograph includes a critical review of the pertinent scientific literature and an evaluation of an agent's potential to cau...

متن کامل

IARC Monographs: 40 Years of Evaluating Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans

BACKGROUND Recently, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Programme for the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans has been criticized for several of its evaluations, and also for the approach used to perform these evaluations. Some critics have claimed that failures of IARC Working Groups to recognize study weaknesses and biases of Working Group members have led to inappr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • ALTEX

دوره 35 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2018